2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuting and innovation: Are closer inventors more productive?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirm the former assumption by our IPO heterogeneity analysis. The latter assumption is supported by existing studies (e.g., Frenkel et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2021) as we discuss in the Introduction.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We confirm the former assumption by our IPO heterogeneity analysis. The latter assumption is supported by existing studies (e.g., Frenkel et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2021) as we discuss in the Introduction.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…(2013) and Xiao et al. (2021) find that knowledge‐workers and inventors strongly prefer a short commuting distance. Also, the 2018 American Community Survey shows that the mean travel time to work is shorter for Mountain View, Palo Alto, Los Altos than the California average.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies focused on the relationship between geographic distance and innovation (Ma and Liu, 2019). Xiao et al (2020) estimated the causal effect of commuting distance on inventor productivity and found a signifi cant negative effect of commuting distance on inventor productivity; that is, every 10km increase in distance Qiao Wang et al / 60-99, Vol. 30, No.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key thought about commuting is the positive impact of commuting flows on creating new workplaces (Russo et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2021). First, vast commuting flows can make it easy to find appropriate candidates for job vacancies to be filled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%