2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3099438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuting and Sickness Absence

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the net effect is free of bias. 14 This is relevant because we are aware of recent studies related to the impact of commuting on absenteeism (Goerke & Lorenz, 2014;Van Ommeren & Gutiérrez-i Puigarnau, 2011) and changes in the productivity/effort when commuting time/distance increases (Ross & Zenou, 2008). Ross and Zenou (2008, p. 502), in a theoretical model on urban efficiency wages, verify how "workers who reside close to jobs will choose not to shirk whereas workers located farther away will shirk."…”
Section: Gender and Region-specific Wage Regressions (First Step)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the net effect is free of bias. 14 This is relevant because we are aware of recent studies related to the impact of commuting on absenteeism (Goerke & Lorenz, 2014;Van Ommeren & Gutiérrez-i Puigarnau, 2011) and changes in the productivity/effort when commuting time/distance increases (Ross & Zenou, 2008). Ross and Zenou (2008, p. 502), in a theoretical model on urban efficiency wages, verify how "workers who reside close to jobs will choose not to shirk whereas workers located farther away will shirk."…”
Section: Gender and Region-specific Wage Regressions (First Step)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large array of previous studies focused on the relationships between the commuting and the employees' labor market performance [2][3][4]. With negative externalities of the sickness absence, the nexus between the commuting and sickness absence has also attracted extensive attentions [2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large array of previous studies focused on the relationships between the commuting and the employees' labor market performance [2][3][4]. With negative externalities of the sickness absence, the nexus between the commuting and sickness absence has also attracted extensive attentions [2,5].Based on the theory of new welfare economics, long commute is viewed as an activity of timeconsumption, which is related with poor psychological and physical health outcomes [6][7][8].Accordingly, the leisure time of employees for health-promoting plans, such as physical activities, relaxation and social participation may be crowded out by the longer commuting time [9]. In addition, while the leisure could be substituted for shirking by each other, there is more likely for shirking behaviors among those employees with a longer commute time [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations