2017
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuting and Taxes: Theory, Empirics and Welfare Implications

Abstract: We examine the effect of interstate differences in income taxes on commuting times. Our theoretical model introduces a border into a model of an urban area and shows that differences in average tax rates distort commuting patterns, but the sign of the effect depends on whether taxes are residencebased or employment-based. Empirically, tax differentials have a large effect on commuting times for affluent households and mobile households. We show that commuting times are a sufficient statistic to measure the spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 This is consistent principal y/o segundaria) understanding that many high-income individuals have multiple contracts. Agrawal and Hoyt (2018), show that firms might relocate, however, in their model, this does not arise with purely residence-based taxation. Our focus is on individual migration in a residence-based system and not on firms.…”
Section: Occupation and Industrymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…38 This is consistent principal y/o segundaria) understanding that many high-income individuals have multiple contracts. Agrawal and Hoyt (2018), show that firms might relocate, however, in their model, this does not arise with purely residence-based taxation. Our focus is on individual migration in a residence-based system and not on firms.…”
Section: Occupation and Industrymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…They examine households whose members reside in one state and work in an adjacent state to show that if two bordering states do have a reciprocity agreement for income taxes, then the state with the higher income taxes will have fewer interstate commuters. When adjacent states do not have reciprocity agreements, Agrawal and Hoyt (2018) find, both population and employment rates are affected by tax changes. Their results are robust to using a panel-data technique, meaning the authors are able to find dynamic responses to income taxes when there is a tax discontinuity at the state border.…”
Section: The Tax Competition Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We further describe bunching at the rst EITC kink point, our outcome of interest, and provide a theoretical discussion why one would expect bunching to increase after a raise in the State EITC. (Agrawal and Hoyt, 2016). See Meghir and Phillips (2008) and Saez et al (2010), for surveys, and Dörrenberg et al (2015) for theory and evidence.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%