2017
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbid anxiety moderates the relationship between depression history and prefrontal EEG asymmetry

Abstract: The internalizing spectrum of psychiatric disorders—depression and anxiety—are common, highly comorbid, and challenging to treat. Individuals with childhood onset depression have a particularly poor prognosis. There is compelling evidence that individuals with depression display reduced resting-state EEG activity at sensors overlying the left prefrontal cortex, even during periods of remission, but it remains unknown whether this asymmetry is evident among individuals with a comorbid anxiety disorder. Here, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the relationship of frontal asymmetry to psychopathology will be facilitated by moving beyond viewing diagnostic entities as homogeneous constructs. Future studies should examine frontal alpha asymmetry's relationship to specific symptoms ( Nelson et al, ), to clusters of features ( Keune et al, ; Nusslock et al, ), or to transdiagnostic dimensions reflecting fundamental processes ( Nelson et al, ) that may underlie a variety of psychopathology (Insel et al, ; Patrick & Hajcak, ).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the relationship of frontal asymmetry to psychopathology will be facilitated by moving beyond viewing diagnostic entities as homogeneous constructs. Future studies should examine frontal alpha asymmetry's relationship to specific symptoms ( Nelson et al, ), to clusters of features ( Keune et al, ; Nusslock et al, ), or to transdiagnostic dimensions reflecting fundamental processes ( Nelson et al, ) that may underlie a variety of psychopathology (Insel et al, ; Patrick & Hajcak, ).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related, Nusslock et al () report that only individuals with a history of childhood onset depression and no comorbid anxiety disorder show reduced left‐frontal activity compared to psychiatrically healthy controls. In contrast, women with a history of depression and pathological levels of anxious apprehension—as indexed by a current generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive‐compulsive disorder, or separation anxiety disorder—were statistically indistinguishable from controls.…”
Section: In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the temporal stability of FAA in a large sample. This supports previous studies showing that FAA mainly depends on a considerable number of trait-like features, insensitive to antidepressant treatment, age, sex or depression severity (Allen et al, 2004;Arns et al, 2016;Bruder et al, 2008;Carvalho et al, 2011;Deldin & Chiu, 2005;Feldmann et al, 2018;Gollan et al, 2014;Keune et al, 2011;Nusslock et al, 2018;Spronk et al, 2008;Sutton & Davidson, 1997;Tomarken et al, 1992;Van der Vinne et al, 2017;Vuga et al, 2006). Similarly, Segrave and colleagues (2011) showed no evidence for antidepressant elicited changes in FAA when comparing a small group of depressed patients on ADs with unmedicated patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Cross-sectionally, several studies showed that FAA is independent of depression severity, both between patients (Allen et al, 2004;Arns et al, 2016;Feldmann et al, 2018;Gollan et al, 2014;Nusslock et al, 2018;Van der Vinne et al, 2017;Vuga et al, 2006) and within patients, including remission (Carvalho et al, 2011). This contrasts the findings by Grünewald et al (2018) and Keune et al (2011), where a higher level of depression complaints correlated with more left-sided FAA (albeit only in the control group of Grünewald et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation