2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbid association of antiphospholipid antibodies and migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a genetic predisposition [27] and a trigger that may damage endothelial surface [28] with aPL generation could explain its heterogeneous presentation. Furthermore, we have observed that there were a few cases that presented other clinical manifestations, such as migraine (34 cases) and high blood pressure (48 cases), reinforcing the theory of endothelial damage [29]. All of our patients have been referred from specialized units in different countries throughout Europe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, a genetic predisposition [27] and a trigger that may damage endothelial surface [28] with aPL generation could explain its heterogeneous presentation. Furthermore, we have observed that there were a few cases that presented other clinical manifestations, such as migraine (34 cases) and high blood pressure (48 cases), reinforcing the theory of endothelial damage [29]. All of our patients have been referred from specialized units in different countries throughout Europe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Quality assessment of each enrolled study was evaluated by SYZ, CZL and HJW based on a modified version (nine-star scoring system) of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for retrospective studies [16]. Studies with NOS scores above or equal to the median were considered high quality (low risk of bias).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality assessment of each of the included studies was evaluated by SYZ, CZL and HJW based on a modified version (nine-star scoring system) of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies [16]. Studies with NOS scores above or equal to the median were considered high quality (low risk of bias).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%