2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity and diagnostic delay in cancer of the larynx, tongue and pharynx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies of comorbidity in SCCHN used either a cross-sectional approach 8,9 or defined comorbidities using a composite comorbidity index. 8,[10][11][12][13][14][15] As a result, limited quantitative data exist to describe the burden of distinct comorbid illnesses diagnosed prior to SCCHN or that arise during the treatment phase. Therefore, a longitudinal study was conducted among a population-based cohort of patients with SCCHN to assess the prevalence and incidence of comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), liver disease, diabetes, anemia, pneumonia, depression, and other malignant disease, and to compare these rates with those observed in a matched noncancer control population.…”
Section: -244 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies of comorbidity in SCCHN used either a cross-sectional approach 8,9 or defined comorbidities using a composite comorbidity index. 8,[10][11][12][13][14][15] As a result, limited quantitative data exist to describe the burden of distinct comorbid illnesses diagnosed prior to SCCHN or that arise during the treatment phase. Therefore, a longitudinal study was conducted among a population-based cohort of patients with SCCHN to assess the prevalence and incidence of comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), liver disease, diabetes, anemia, pneumonia, depression, and other malignant disease, and to compare these rates with those observed in a matched noncancer control population.…”
Section: -244 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early diagnosis and treatment are especially critical to survival in patients with head and neck malignancies. [1][2][3][4][5] Author Contributions…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of head and neck cancer, clearly lower stage cancers, which are presumably diagnosed earlier, have a better prognosis and survival than late stage or widely metastatic tumors. [1][2][3][4][5] Factors that influence productivity and efficiency include ''infrastructure, human resource management, scheduling variation, process flow, technology, and information management limitations.'' 6 We had concerns of inefficiencies in the existing process for obtaining guided needle biopsies of head and neck masses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waiting time should be as short as possible so as not to delay treatment initiation, and comprises two periods: the time needed for assessment and discussion of the patient's file in MDTM, and the time needed to set up treatment (surgery, radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy). Delay in assessment or treatment results in advanced tumor and worsened prognosis [3] (level of evidence 2), [4] (level of evidence 3). Each week of waiting time for radiation therapy reduces tumoral control by 1% [5] (level of evidence 4).…”
Section: Management Delay: Work-up and Treatment Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, the literature points to a negative impact of increased time to treatment on local control and survival [3] (level of evidence 2), [4] (level of evidence 3).…”
Section: Management Delay: Work-up and Treatment Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%