2010
DOI: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181d695af
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity in Aging and Dementia: Scales Differ, and the Difference Matters

Abstract: Background-Accurate assessment of dementia's impact on health care utilization and costs requires separation of the effects of comorbid conditions, often poorly accounted for in existing claims-based studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In certain communities, more than 80% of the elderly people do not read or write. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) has been translated into many languages and its use as an initial screening tool was settled [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain communities, more than 80% of the elderly people do not read or write. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) has been translated into many languages and its use as an initial screening tool was settled [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIRS has been shown to correlate with medication use and disability, and to predict mortality, hospitalization, and disability (e.g., Borson, Scanlan, Lessig, & DeMers, 2010; Parmelee, Thuras, Katz, & Lawton, 1995). In our study, the CIRS-G was completed by a licensed registered nurse with training and supervision from one of the study physicians (JS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient variables included demographic descriptors, a defined set of 5 behavioral problems (27) reported by caregivers and/or observed during interview (anger/hostility, visual/auditory hallucinations, irritability, suspiciousness/paranoia, severe social withdrawal), dementia stage (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]) (28), and burden of chronic disease (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, 13 item modification for medical conditions comorbid with cognitive disorders [CIRS-G-13]) (31). Caregiver variables included relationship to the care recipient (spouse or other relative); living situation (together or apart) and the caregiver’s current level of perceived stress using a single question (“Overall, how stressful is your caregiving situation at this time?” scored 1 [not at all] to 5 [extremely]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%