2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity in head and neck cancer: A critical appraisal and recommendations for practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
181
6
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
17
181
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2,21 Demographic factors such as age, sex, race, familial history of cancer, socioeconomic status, lifestyles, and habits (tobacco, alcohol, and substance abuse) are only a few of the many factors that impact outcomes of treatment. 13,14,22,23 Clinicians regularly use this information in the decision-making process for treatment of patients with cancer. However, none of the other host characteristics have representation in the current staging system for oral cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,21 Demographic factors such as age, sex, race, familial history of cancer, socioeconomic status, lifestyles, and habits (tobacco, alcohol, and substance abuse) are only a few of the many factors that impact outcomes of treatment. 13,14,22,23 Clinicians regularly use this information in the decision-making process for treatment of patients with cancer. However, none of the other host characteristics have representation in the current staging system for oral cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in elderly patients, these predominantly consist of reduced organ and cognitive functions, malnutrition, polypharmacy, and socio-economic factors. Most studies show that approximately 60 % of head and neck cancer patients have concurrent illnesses [5]. For better evaluation of comorbidities, weighted assessment systems like Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) include the occurrence of comorbidities as well as their degrees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than actual tumour staging and treatment, co-morbidity burden, race and performance status are all factors which affect prognosis (Paleri et al, 2010). Some studies suggest factors such as stromal involvement are the most accurate for predicting the outcome of OPSCC lesions (Marsh et al, 2011), whereas others show that patterns of tumour invasion and differentiation, together with cervical node involvement, to be the most important (Rogers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%