2008 Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ccgrid.2008.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMP Superscalar: Bringing GRID Superscalar and GCM Together

Abstract: This paper presents a framework to easily build and execute parallel applications in container-based distributed computing platforms in a user transparent way. The proposed framework is a combination of the COMP Superscalar and Docker. We have built a prototype in order to evaluate how it performs by evaluating the overhead in the building, deployment and execution phases. We have observed an important gain compared with cloud environments during the building and deployment phases. In contrast, we have detecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By flattening access to disparate, homogeneous resources, grid technologies should yield an abundance of raw computational power that should be irresistible to anyone desiring high performance computing. While grid projects such as Cui et al (2007), Natrajan et al (2004), Tejedor and Badia (2008), and Rubio-Solar et al (2008) each enjoy success in their own goals, no single implementation has dominated. Though all aim for generality, all have features that are tuned to their own application domains, and are not generic enough for each other's purposes.…”
Section: Grid-inspiredmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By flattening access to disparate, homogeneous resources, grid technologies should yield an abundance of raw computational power that should be irresistible to anyone desiring high performance computing. While grid projects such as Cui et al (2007), Natrajan et al (2004), Tejedor and Badia (2008), and Rubio-Solar et al (2008) each enjoy success in their own goals, no single implementation has dominated. Though all aim for generality, all have features that are tuned to their own application domains, and are not generic enough for each other's purposes.…”
Section: Grid-inspiredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though all aim for generality, all have features that are tuned to their own application domains, and are not generic enough for each other's purposes. All target large-scale computation, but only one maintains an interface simple enough for lightweight tasks from casual users (Tejedor and Badia 2008). The few that are aware of data locality require specialized tools to construct tasks.…”
Section: Grid-inspiredmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed scheduler has been designed to be applied to the COMP Superscalar (COMPSs) framework [9,10]. It provides an infrastructure-agnostic task-based programming model, which facilitates the development of parallel applications in distributed computing platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each StarSs member targets a particular architecture [6] [4] [5]; nevertheless, all share the same philosophy: the user is only required to select a set of methods of a sequential application that will run as parallel tasks on the available resources. For each method parameter, its direction (input, output or in-out) needs to be specified; this information is used by StarSs to discover, at execution time, the data dependencies between tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%