1990
DOI: 10.1515/form.1990.2.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact 8-dimensional Projective Planes

Abstract: The only compact 8-dimensional projective planes admitting an automorphism group of dimension at least 17 are 5 one-parameter families of division ring planes, the Hughes planes, the nearfield planes, a two-parameter family of proper translation planes and their duals. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classification (1985 Revision): 51H10.= (p, fi) is a topological projective plane with a compact connected point set P of finite (covering) dimension, then each line L e fi is homotopy-equivalent to a sphere §' with t = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a) For the Spin planes, we have two conjugacy classes of polarities, both with unitals of spherical type (5,1). The group equals R/Z for the first class, and Spin 3 for the second one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a) For the Spin planes, we have two conjugacy classes of polarities, both with unitals of spherical type (5,1). The group equals R/Z for the first class, and Spin 3 for the second one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Planes over mutations admit two classes of polarities, with unitals of spherical type (7,3) and (5,1), respectively. In the first case, we have = SO 3 R, while = R/Z in the second case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All such planes with automorphism groups of dimension at least 17 have been determined by Salzmann [9]. For semisimple groups, this bound lowers to 16 (see [9,(1)]).…”
Section: Remarks (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classification of compact projective planes with large automorphism groups, as accomplished by Salzmann in [22], [24], [29] and [28], it turned out that the hardest case is the one where the automorphism group E is neither semi-simple nor reductive, but has a normal subgroup 0 ~-~t. This subgroup 0 is then identified as a group of elations, and elaborate arguments show that E contains a transitive elation group, if dim E is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%