2016
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2015.2510025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Grating Coupler for 700-nm Silicon Nitride Strip Waveguides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute the excess loss to a less than optimal 300 μm long waveguide taper. The taper loss can be reduced by using either longer adiabatic tapers [11], focusing gratings [12] or compact tapers [39]. Since the test structure has smooth transition due to adiabatic tapering, we do not observe any ripples in the measured spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We attribute the excess loss to a less than optimal 300 μm long waveguide taper. The taper loss can be reduced by using either longer adiabatic tapers [11], focusing gratings [12] or compact tapers [39]. Since the test structure has smooth transition due to adiabatic tapering, we do not observe any ripples in the measured spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Implementing efficient GCs in a thick waveguide layer can be quite challenging, as the excitation of higher-order vertical Bloch modes inside the grating usually leads to a drastic deterioration of the CE. This problem was mitigated in [95], where a UGC with a peak CE of 43% (−3.7 dB) and a 1-dB bandwidth of 54 nm was implemented in a 700 nm thick silicon nitride-on-insulator (SNOI) platform. In that case, to prevent the excitation of high-order Bloch modes, the access waveguide was etched down to the same level as the grating trenches, and an inverse taper was used to connect the Si 3 N 4 strip waveguide and the grating section, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Large-bandwidth Grating Couplersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with [97], a thicker SiO 2 separation layer (H 1.68 μm) was placed in between the 400 nm thick Si 3 N 4 layer, where the actual fully etched apodized grating was implemented, and the 220 nm thick Si layer, where a fully etched grating was designed to act as a bottom reflector. By careful optimization [95]. The access waveguide thickness (t) is equal to thickness of the native Si 3 N 4 layer (t SN ) minus the etch depth (t g ).…”
Section: Large-bandwidth Grating Couplersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The grating coupler is capable of wafer-level testing and enhancing on-chip compactness. However, for a uniform grating coupler based on a standard 220 nm-thick silicon silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform, there are also some disadvantages such as low coupling efficiency, wavelength and polarization sensitivity, which make them inappropriate for WDM applications [11][12][13]. As for the butt coupling or package with conventional cleaved optical fiber, the edge coupler is more convenient to use, which can achieve higher coupling efficiency, a much more flexible operating wavelength and less dependence on polarization than grating coupler [7,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%