2009
DOI: 10.2528/pierl08111404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Microstrip-Fed Antenna for Ultra-Wideband Applications

Abstract: Abstract-A novel printed monopole antenna for ultra-wideband (UWB) applications is presented, which is composed of wide slot and Y-shaped microstrip feed line with a pair of inverted-L-shaped notches. The prototype with an overall size of 26 mm × 30 mm × 2 mm achieves good impedance matching, constant gain, stable radiation patterns, and a relative impedance bandwidth of 110.6% is achieved, which covers 3.09-10.74 GHz.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency range of operation for such antennas is generally defined as 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz (the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) bandwidth). The operational bandwidth of an antenna is usually defined as the frequency range over which the return loss S 11 is less than 10% (-10dB) [6][7][8][9][10], although some papers present results in terms of VSWR. In this work we have modeled an existing design [11] using ADS, analyzing the results in terms of S 11 and then optimized the design stage-by-stage to improve the bandwidth performance whilst reducing the overall patch size relative to the original design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency range of operation for such antennas is generally defined as 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz (the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) bandwidth). The operational bandwidth of an antenna is usually defined as the frequency range over which the return loss S 11 is less than 10% (-10dB) [6][7][8][9][10], although some papers present results in terms of VSWR. In this work we have modeled an existing design [11] using ADS, analyzing the results in terms of S 11 and then optimized the design stage-by-stage to improve the bandwidth performance whilst reducing the overall patch size relative to the original design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, UWB transmission devices do not need to transmit a high-power signal to the receiver and can have a longer battery life or be smaller to reduce the wearable devices size [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Several antennas have been developed for wearable antennas in the form of flexible metal patches on textile substrates [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one limiting factor of these antennas is their low bandwidth. Therefore, several configurations were carried out to increase the bandwidth of planar antennas such as ultra-wideband antennas rectangle shape [1][2][3][4], circular [5][6][7][8], elliptical [9], triangle [10] and several other types of antennas [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%