2020
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.22380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Yagi‐Uda slot antenna with metamaterial element for wide bandwidth wireless application

Abstract: In this article, an antenna with the combination of the microstrip slot and Yagi antenna is presented for wideband WLAN (wireless local area network) using CRLH (composite right/left‐handed) as a metamaterial (Left‐hand) element. The T‐shape feed line is investigated as a radiator section and modified for enhancing the bandwidth. The periodic elements are utilized as a novel type of the director to improve the bandwidth to more than 35% and increase the gain of the antenna to more than 80% where the three CRLH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to CST's calculations, the proposed design has a peak gain of 6.9 dBi, as opposed to the 5.6 dBi, 6.46 dBi, 6.73 dBi, 5.02 dBi, 4.27 dBi, 4.3 dBi, and 5 dBi reported by the references. Reference articles [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] report radiation efficiencies of 82.4%, 70%, 80%, 73%, and 96%, respectively; however, 89.9% is measured in CST for the proposed Yagi antenna. The investigations based on machine learning are not employed in the references that have been listed above; even so, they are extensively used in the design that has been presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to CST's calculations, the proposed design has a peak gain of 6.9 dBi, as opposed to the 5.6 dBi, 6.46 dBi, 6.73 dBi, 5.02 dBi, 4.27 dBi, 4.3 dBi, and 5 dBi reported by the references. Reference articles [9] , [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] report radiation efficiencies of 82.4%, 70%, 80%, 73%, and 96%, respectively; however, 89.9% is measured in CST for the proposed Yagi antenna. The investigations based on machine learning are not employed in the references that have been listed above; even so, they are extensively used in the design that has been presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 1 shows a comparison of many ongoing parallel activities. Reference papers [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] report reflection coefficients of -35.58 dB, -27 dB, -25.02 dB, -35 dB, -29 dB, and -32 dB, respectively; nevertheless, in the suggested Yagi antenna, it is observed as -38.4 dB in CST. According to CST's calculations, the proposed design has a peak gain of 6.9 dBi, as opposed to the 5.6 dBi, 6.46 dBi, 6.73 dBi, 5.02 dBi, 4.27 dBi, 4.3 dBi, and 5 dBi reported by the references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation