2018
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8mcnh
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Sparse Merkle Trees

Abstract: A Sparse Merkle tree is based on the idea of a complete Merkle tree of an intractable size. The assumption here is that as the size of the tree is intractable, there would only be a few leaf nodes with valid data blocks relative to the tree size, rendering the tree as sparse. We present a novel approach called Minimum distance path algorithm to simulate this Merkle tree of intractable size which gives us efficient space-time trade-offs. We provide the algorithms for insertion, deletion and (non -) membership proo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Merkle hash tree (MHT) is an authenticated data structure where every leaf node of the tree contains the cryptographic hash of a data block and every non-leaf node contains the concatenated hashes of its child nodes [7]. MHTs allow linking a set of data to a unique hash value, the Merkle hash tree root (MR), allowing efficient and secure verification of the consistency and content of large sets of data.…”
Section: Merkle Hash Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Merkle hash tree (MHT) is an authenticated data structure where every leaf node of the tree contains the cryptographic hash of a data block and every non-leaf node contains the concatenated hashes of its child nodes [7]. MHTs allow linking a set of data to a unique hash value, the Merkle hash tree root (MR), allowing efficient and secure verification of the consistency and content of large sets of data.…”
Section: Merkle Hash Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the data portion d e does not start with the index e, the provider was cheating, so the transaction ends transferring the costs (p+collateral) to the consumer. (7) withdraw:…”
Section: Providermentioning
confidence: 99%