1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01759350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compactifications, A-compactifications and proximities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Lemma 3.15, there exists a PB-sublattice L of L(X) such that p(L ) = L. In Proposition 2.12 of [5] we show that the relation δ L generated by L , defined in the same way as we define here the relation δ L , is a proximity on the space (X, T ). Hence, δ L is such one, as well.…”
Section: Lemma 315 For Every Pbs-sublatticementioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By Lemma 3.15, there exists a PB-sublattice L of L(X) such that p(L ) = L. In Proposition 2.12 of [5] we show that the relation δ L generated by L , defined in the same way as we define here the relation δ L , is a proximity on the space (X, T ). Hence, δ L is such one, as well.…”
Section: Lemma 315 For Every Pbs-sublatticementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hence, in general, not every Hausdorff compactification of a Tychonoff space X can be obtained as a maximal spectrum of a normal Wallman base of X. In our paper [6], using the notion of PB-sublattice introduced in [5], we answered affirmatively two natural questions. The first one was: Problem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations