Sediment Diagenesis 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7259-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compactional Diagenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure solution is a possible mechanism for the generation of silica cement from the interbedded mudstones [12,13]. Pressure dissolution of silica is minor in the upper 1500 m of the sediments, but increases in a roughly linear manner with depth [14]. Quartz-rich mudstones and siltstones that have undergone pressure dissolution may be possible sources for the generation of silica cement in the sandstone-rich section of the basin.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure solution is a possible mechanism for the generation of silica cement from the interbedded mudstones [12,13]. Pressure dissolution of silica is minor in the upper 1500 m of the sediments, but increases in a roughly linear manner with depth [14]. Quartz-rich mudstones and siltstones that have undergone pressure dissolution may be possible sources for the generation of silica cement in the sandstone-rich section of the basin.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All known primary ore in the Grants uranium region lies under the mudflat facies of the Brushy Basin Member (Fishman and others, 1984). The downward movement of alkaline, humic-acidbearing pore fluids was driven by compaction and salinity gradients, a common phenomenon where fine-grained lacustrine sediments overlie permeable strata (Chilingarian, 1983) and which has been modeled in modern lakes by Winter (1981). This hypothesis is supported by Fe-Ti-oxide alteration patterns in the upper part of the Westwater Canyon Member in the ML-LV cores (Reynolds and others, 1986) Grants uranium region (Adams and others, 1974).…”
Section: Origin Of Epigenetic Amorphous Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mudrocks buried to a depth of 3.4 km are compacted to between 5 % and 10 % porosity (from an initial 70-90 % porosity). Burial to a depth of 7.3 km will result in compaction to less than 3 % porosity (Chilingarian, 1983). Therefore differential compaction is a possible explanation for the thickness variation between the two sections.…”
Section: Cause Of the Thickness Variation Between Spengill And Stockdmentioning
confidence: 99%