We consider the following dichotomy for Σ 0 2 finitary relations R on analytic subsets of the generalized Baire space for κ: either all R-independent sets are of size at most κ, or there is a κ-perfect Rindependent set. This dichotomy is the uncountable version of a result found in (W. Kubiś, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), no 2.:619-623) and in (S. Shelah, Fund. Math. 159 (1999), no. 1:1-50). We prove that the above statement holds assuming ♦ κ and the set theoretical hypothesis I − (κ), which is the modification of the hypothesis I(κ) suitable for limit cardinals. When κ is inaccessible, or when R is a closed binary relation, the assumption ♦ κ is not needed.We obtain as a corollary the uncountable version of a result by G. Sági and the first author (Log. J. IGPL 20 (2012), no. 6:1064-1082) about the κ-sized models of a Σ 1 1 (L κ + κ )-sentence when considered up to isomorphism, or elementary embeddability, by elements of a K κ subset of κ κ. The role of elementary embeddings can be replaced by a more general notion that also includes embeddings, as well as the maps preserving L λµ for ω ≤ µ ≤ λ ≤ κ and the finite variable fragments of these logics.