2012
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability and utility of body composition measurement vs. anthropometric measurement for assessing obesity related health risks in Korean men

Abstract: Waist-to-height ratio seems to be the best screening tool for evaluating metabolic syndrome in Korean men, and adding FMI could result in a modest increase in integrated discrimination improvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our results, previous cross‐sectional data also showed only moderate associations between regional fat depots and insulin resistance in children, adolescents and adults . When compared with BMI, recent studies have shown that FM adjusted for height improved the prediction of insulin resistance in adults with no improvements in children and adolescents . However, insulin resistance results from a multidimensional dynamic process, which cannot be addressed in a cross‐sectional study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In line with our results, previous cross‐sectional data also showed only moderate associations between regional fat depots and insulin resistance in children, adolescents and adults . When compared with BMI, recent studies have shown that FM adjusted for height improved the prediction of insulin resistance in adults with no improvements in children and adolescents . However, insulin resistance results from a multidimensional dynamic process, which cannot be addressed in a cross‐sectional study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Another study also suggested that BMI, waist circumference and WHtR values were all associated with metabolic risk factors, and they may equally predict multiple metabolic risk factors [25]. A Korean study showed that WHtR was a better screening tool than BMI and waist circumference for adult metabolic risk factors was the best screening tool for evaluation MetS in Korean men [26, 27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMI of 7.00 kg/m 2 for men and 7.90 kg/m 2 for women by BIA could effectively predict the presence of MetS in our study. A recent study [34] showed that waist-to-height ratio, which was a better screening tool than BMI and waist circumference for adult metabolic risk factors demonstrated in a recent systematic review [35], was the best screening tool for evaluation MetS in Korean men, and adding FMI could result in a modest increase in integrated discrimination improvement. Data analysis for the combination of waist-to-height ratio with FMI are not shown in this study, further investigation should be conducted with the aim at determining whether the combination is appropriate for Chinese population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%