2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability of modern contraceptive use estimates between a face-to-face survey and a cellphone survey among women in Burkina Faso

Abstract: Introduction The proliferation of cell phone ownership in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) presents the opportunity to collect public health indicators at a lower cost compared to face-to-face (FTF) surveys. This analysis assesses the equivalence of modern contraceptive prevalence estimates between a nationally representative FTF survey and a cell phone survey using random digit dialing (RDD) among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso. Methods We analyzed data from two surveys conducted in Burkina Faso between De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, previous data collected in Burkina Faso indicate substantial differences in contraceptive use estimates between telephone and face-to-face interviews. 29 Our results might similarly face such biases because of survey modality, as evidenced by large increases in contraceptive use. Furthermore, to minimise survey length, information about sexual activity was unavailable in the COVID-19 follow-up survey, which led to the exclusion of non-cohabiting partnered women from this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Specifically, previous data collected in Burkina Faso indicate substantial differences in contraceptive use estimates between telephone and face-to-face interviews. 29 Our results might similarly face such biases because of survey modality, as evidenced by large increases in contraceptive use. Furthermore, to minimise survey length, information about sexual activity was unavailable in the COVID-19 follow-up survey, which led to the exclusion of non-cohabiting partnered women from this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Only three out of four potential participants had a phone number where they could be contacted, and among those about 80% participated in the COVID-19 study. We did not employ post-stratification techniques to adjust study estimates (Greenleaf et al 2020). If the COVID-related knowledge and/or behaviors of nonparticipants differ from those of participants, our results might be biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a face-to-face survey was used in this study. This may have affected the real response of people at high risk of stroke to certain items, and another method of data collection may be needed in the future [50]. Finally, this study only veri ed the reliability and validity…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 77%