2004
DOI: 10.1097/00131746-200409000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability of Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews in Assessing Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Abstract: Phone interviews are a reliable method of interviewing for use in assessing patients for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
95
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, phone interviews seem to be a reliable method to assess PTSD (Aziz & Kenford, 2004). Moreover, the inter-rater reliability was excellent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, phone interviews seem to be a reliable method to assess PTSD (Aziz & Kenford, 2004). Moreover, the inter-rater reliability was excellent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, phone interviews seem to be a reliable method to assess PTSD (Aziz & Kenford, 2004;Rohde, Lewinsohn, & Seeley, 1997). Moreover, the inter-rater reliability was excellent although perhaps somewhat inflated, as both the interviewers and the auditor knew the exposure criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we did not assess neuropsychological functioning, and so it is diffi cult to determine the extent to which impaired cognitive performance contributed to PTSD development. Third, we assessed PTSD symptoms at follow-up via telephone rather than in a face-to-face format; we note, however, that comparisons indicate that telephone and personal interviews compare favorably (Aziz & Kenford, 2004 ). Fourth, we note that PTA may be infl uenced by analgesic medications in a traumatically injured population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%