2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-40422009000500043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação entre métodos de quantificação em cromatografia gasosa: um experimento para cursos de química

Abstract: Recebido em 23/4/08; aceito em 3/2/09; publicado na web em 7/5/09 COMPARISON OF QUANTIFICATION METHODS IN GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY: AN EXPERIMENT FOR CHEMISTRY COURSES. This article describes an experiment designed to teach quantitative determination in gas chromatography (GC) in Organic and Analytical Chemistry practical classes. The experiment consisted of extracting and analyzing eugenol from clove seeds to perform a quantitative approach aimed at comparing results obtained by external and internal calibration pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Phellandrene, linalool, caryophylene and nerolidol (Sigma-Aldrich) were selected to represent the response factors for monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes, respectively. Analyses for the RRF calculation were completed five times at four concentrations (0.0104, 0.0146, 0.0187 and 0.0229 mg·mL −1 ) [ 62 ] and the average response factors were obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phellandrene, linalool, caryophylene and nerolidol (Sigma-Aldrich) were selected to represent the response factors for monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes, respectively. Analyses for the RRF calculation were completed five times at four concentrations (0.0104, 0.0146, 0.0187 and 0.0229 mg·mL −1 ) [ 62 ] and the average response factors were obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the parameter is considered insignificant and should be removed from the linear equation (y = a + bx). 27 The LODs and LOQs were estimated from successive injection of dilute solutions of the lowest concentration that resulted in signal/noise ratios of three and ten, respectively. Accuracy was demonstrated by the recovery experiments through analyzing samples spiked with pesticides at 0.08, 0.1, 0.14, 0.17, 0.35 and 1.17 mg kg -1 , performed by triplicate assay and duplicate injection.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proposed method showed good linearity, expressed by the values of R near 1.00, with the lowest value being 0.993 (ethoprophos curves in the matrix), and all of the analytes were in accordance with the guidelines of ANVISA 25 that recommend values above 0.99. However, ideally the regression line should pass through the origin, 27,35 but this fact is rarely observed. Therefore, the adjustment of the analytical curve by statistical tests to minimize quantitative errors must be taken into account.…”
Section: Matrix Effect and Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A técnica de cromatografia gasosa envolve um detector capaz de responder a determinado composto de maneira proporcional a sua concentração no ambiente, realiza análises qualitativas e quantitativas de forma rápida na determinação de compostos presentes em concentrações relativamente baixas em diferentes amostragens, o método direto envolve a preparação de uma série de soluções padrão com concentração próxima ao composto a ser analisado (LIGIERO et al, 2009). Essa técnica é utilizada para determinar tanto a concentração de amônia nos ambientes quanto a concentração de amônia capturada nos coletores, bem como para determinar a concentração de hexafluoreto de enxofre (SF 6 ), quando esse é utilizado como gás marcador para determinar a taxa de emissão de amônia de forma indireta (SARAZ et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cromatografia Gasosaunclassified