2016
DOI: 10.21678/0252-1865-00430078_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de comisiones por flujo y por saldo en sistemas de pensiones con cuentas individuales de capitalización

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesa‐Lago (2016), the OECD (2019), and Olivera (2016a) have recommended an integrated pension system that includes a defined benefit pillar which would increase the scale of the pension industry. The competitiveness of pension services could be increased by: (i) eliminating the requisite that all four of the AFPs deliver a minimum portfolio investment return, (ii) investing in index funds with lower administration fees, (iii) introducing a state‐owned AFP, and (iv) keeping the annual balance fee at 0.5% or less (Caycho, 2016; Chavéz‐Bedoya & Ramírez‐Rondán, 2016; Moloche, 2012; Rojas, 2014).…”
Section: The Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesa‐Lago (2016), the OECD (2019), and Olivera (2016a) have recommended an integrated pension system that includes a defined benefit pillar which would increase the scale of the pension industry. The competitiveness of pension services could be increased by: (i) eliminating the requisite that all four of the AFPs deliver a minimum portfolio investment return, (ii) investing in index funds with lower administration fees, (iii) introducing a state‐owned AFP, and (iv) keeping the annual balance fee at 0.5% or less (Caycho, 2016; Chavéz‐Bedoya & Ramírez‐Rondán, 2016; Moloche, 2012; Rojas, 2014).…”
Section: The Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%