Comparación de dos Versiones Reducidas de la Escala PANAS: Análisis Factoriales en una Muestra Argentina

Flores-Kanter, Pablo Ezequiel; Medrano, Leonardo Adrián

doi:10.21865/ridep49.4.03

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, it would be interesting to verify whether the results evidenced in the present research are replicated with the inclusion of the Alert and Excited items. Beyond these considerations, it is relevant to indicate that the evidence obtained here on the internal structure of the PANAS is consistent with data previously obtained for Argentine population using the 20‐item version (see Flores‐Kanter & Medrano, 2018 ; Medrano et al, 2015 ; Moriondo et al, 2011 ).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…In one of the developed studies, the timeframes used in their instructions differ considerably (i.e., affective‐state version vs. trait‐like version). Moreover, other inconsistencies are found in the adapted versions, including English, German, French, Italian, Canadian, Spanish, and, to a lesser extent, those developed in Latin American countries (Flores‐Kanter & Medrano, 2018 ; Heubeck & Wilkinson, 2019 ). In the present study, we will first overview the available literature on the observed variability in the dimensionality obtained from the PANAS scores and the discussion around its internal structure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor analytic literature. ObjectiveThe main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PA-NAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. EGA was used to (1) estimate the dimensionality of the PANAS scores, (2) establish the stability of the dimensionality estimate and of the item assignments into the dimensions, and (3) assess the impact of potential redundancies across item pairs on the dimensionality and structure of the PANAS scores. MethodThis assessment was carried out across two studies that included two large samples of participants.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This aligns with previous studies [85,86], noting that, after numerous controversies, it has been concluded that Subjective Well-being includes cognitive-evaluative components (the evaluation of how satisfied a person is with their life, i.e., the relationship between desired and achieved goals) and affective-emotional components (how much a person experiences more pleasant than negative emotions in their life), with the emotional dimension consisting of positive and negative affects. Some authors have argued that these two affects should be considered separate and relatively independent structures [87,88], while other studies have found moderate to high negative correlations between them [89,90].…”

Section: First Dimension: Emotional Statesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Subjective Well-Being and Quality of Life in Mexico: Insights from Structural Equation Modeling

Mendoza-Martínez,

Marroquín-Tovar,

Rivas-Díaz

et al. 2024

COVID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amid the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, the living conditions of the population were dramatically altered, with social distancing measures and the looming threat to public health leaving a profound impact on people’s lives. This study aims to assess the influence of COVID-19 on subjective well-being and overall quality of life in Mexico. A structural model with latent variables was used. Data were extracted from the National Self-Reported Well-being Survey (SWLS) from October 2020 and January 2021, featuring a robust sample size of 3615 residents from urban areas in Mexico, all aged 18 and above. Findings revealed that around 38% of the variance in overall life satisfaction in October 2020 and January 2021 could be attributed to Personal well-being (0.231), Personal satisfaction (0.320), Satisfaction with the environment (0.076), and Negative emotional states (−0.116). In comparison, October 2019 to January 2020 saw a lower 20% explained variance, primarily associated with Personal well-being (0.184), Personal satisfaction (0.270), and Satisfaction with the environment (0.052). Reliability assessments, including Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients, Rho_a, and Composite Reliability, all surpassed 0.70 for each subscale. In addition, our study confirmed convergent validity, as the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) consistently exceeded 0.50 across all subscales, while the discriminant coefficient exceeded 0.70.

show abstract

“…Además de las dificultados en la interpretación de los reactivos y adaptación a diversos idiomas, en particular al español, se han documentado ciertas inconsistencias en el marco temporal indicado en las instrucciones (rasgo versus estado; frecuencia versus intensidad) y en las estructuras factoriales resultantes (Flores-Kanter & Medrano, 2018;Heubeck & Wilkinson, 2019). Todos estos elementos muestran que los datos de la validación psicométrica del PANAS en hispanoparlantes podrían resultar controversiales.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Inventario de Activación y Valencia de la Afectividad (IAVA-30 e IAVA-18): Desarrollo y Validación

Calleja¹,

Mota²

2023

REV IBEROAM DIAGN EV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El propósito del estudio fue desarrollar y validar un instrumento para medir los dos ejes de la afectividad (valencia y activación) en hispanohablantes. Se generaron los reactivos a partir de las respuestas a un cuestionario abierto sobre estados de ánimo. Expertos juzgaron su validez de contenido. La escala se aplicó electrónicamente a 383 mexicanos de población abierta. La conformación factorial más adecuada resultó al analizar los reactivos de alta energía en una escala y los de baja energía en otra. En la primera surgieron cuatro factores, dos de estado de ánimo positivo (alegría y vitalidad) y dos de negativo (miedo y enojo); en baja energía, uno positivo (tranquilidad) y uno negativo (desánimo). Se confirmaron estas estructuras factoriales en una segunda muestra (n=379), con confiabilidad >.85. Se conformó una versión breve y se aplicó a una tercera muestra (n=591); se obtuvieron índices de ajuste y confiabilidad satisfactorios. En conclusión, el IAVA-30 y el IAVA-18 mostraron calidad psicométrica para medir afectividad en hispanohablantes.

show abstract

Comparación de dos Versiones Reducidas de la Escala PANAS: Análisis Factoriales en una Muestra Argentina

Cited by 9 publications

References 18 publications

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity

Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Subjective Well-Being and Quality of Life in Mexico: Insights from Structural Equation Modeling

Inventario de Activación y Valencia de la Afectividad (IAVA-30 e IAVA-18): Desarrollo y Validación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About