2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acci.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de índices de riesgo de mortalidad en pacientes pediátricos con choque séptico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In absolute terms, this means 24 more occurrences (95% CI, 6 to 55) of digital ischemia per 1000 patients treated with vasopressin. When the 4 studies at high risk of bias were excluded, the resultant estimate was not significantly different. Definitions varied for this outcome; however, when the analysis was limited to the 6 studies that specifically described “digital ischemia,” the resultant estimate did not change significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In absolute terms, this means 24 more occurrences (95% CI, 6 to 55) of digital ischemia per 1000 patients treated with vasopressin. When the 4 studies at high risk of bias were excluded, the resultant estimate was not significantly different. Definitions varied for this outcome; however, when the analysis was limited to the 6 studies that specifically described “digital ischemia,” the resultant estimate did not change significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the 4 studies at high risk of bias were excluded, the resultant estimate was not significantly different. Definitions varied for this outcome; however, when the analysis was limited to the 6 studies that specifically described “digital ischemia,” the resultant estimate did not change significantly. Thus, evidence was not downgraded for indirectness but, because it was a post hoc outcome, it was downgraded for risk of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations