Comparación de la herramienta Trigger con el conjunto mínimo básico de datos (CMBD) para la detección de eventos adversos en cirugía general

Zapata, Ana Pérez; Cuéllar, Elías Rodríguez; Cámara, Agustı́n Gómez de la; Ruiz-López, Pedro

doi:10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.001

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The prevalence of 21.8% of surgical AEs found in the present study was higher than that registered in research conducted in Sweden (15.4%) 13 , in a university hospital in Japan (15.1%) 14 , and falls short of a study carried out in Spain with patients submitted to general surgery (36.8%) 15 . In Brazil, in a study carried out in three hospitals in the Southeast region, the incidence of surgical AEs was 3.5% 16 , while in Europe, in a study in 30 public acute care hospitals care hospitals, the incidence was 13.1% 17 .…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 92%

“…The avoidability of surgical AEs was higher than the values reported in several studies, ranging from 5.2% to 70.8% 4,13,15-17,20 , which raises the need to evaluate, at the same time, indicators of surgical care. It also may encourage managers, surgeons, and nursing staff, among others, to reassess the care process and to propose actions for continuous improvement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…The third most prevalent AE was associated with hematomas/seromas and represented, in a Spanish study, 8.9% (n = 16) of patients submitted to general surgery 15 . This AE, if not treated properly, can cause physical discomfort and increase the risk of infection 27 , besides compromising the cicatrization process and predisposing the patients to surgical wound suture dehiscence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prevalência e evitabilidade de eventos adversos cirúrgicos em hospital de ensino do Brasil

Batista

Cruz

Alpendre

et al. 2019

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective to estimate the prevalence and avoidability of surgical adverse events in a teaching hospital and to classify the events according to the type of incident and degree of damage.Method cross-sectional retrospective study carried out in two phases. In phase I, nurses performed a retrospective review on a simple randomized sample of 192 records of adult patients using the Canadian Adverse Events Study form for case tracking. Phase II aimed at confirming the adverse event by an expert committee composed of physicians and nurses. Data were analyzed by univariate descriptive statistics.Results the prevalence of surgical adverse events was 21.8%. In 52.4% of the cases, detection occurred on outpatient return. Of the 60 cases analyzed, 90% (n = 54) were preventable and more than two thirds resulted in mild to moderate damage. Surgical technical failures contributed in approximately 40% of the cases. There was a prevalence of the infection category associated with health care (50%, n = 30). Adverse events were mostly related to surgical site infection (30%, n = 18), suture dehiscence (16.7%, n = 10) and hematoma/seroma (15%, n = 9).Conclusion the prevalence and avoidability of surgical adverse events are challenges faced by hospital management.

show abstract