2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rh.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de la medición del ángulo de Cobb: tradicional versus asistida por ordenador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, among the cases of left thoracolumbar scoliosis, 66.7% (n=4) presented correct right and left LT responses and 33.3% (n=2) had insufficient responses. Cobb angle measurement 18 for each of the deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, among the cases of left thoracolumbar scoliosis, 66.7% (n=4) presented correct right and left LT responses and 33.3% (n=2) had insufficient responses. Cobb angle measurement 18 for each of the deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Insufficient response: when the result of the ratio between contraction with imbalances and contraction without imbalance for the musculature being assessed is less than one. Radiological exams were used to determine the type of scoliosis, measured using the Cobb method, the reliability of which has been proven 18 both in quantifying the degree and indicating the vertebral limits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%