2014
DOI: 10.1051/lhb/2014035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparaison de différentes méthodes d'estimation des niveaux extrêmes en site à fort et à faible marnage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the error depends on the geographic area and the historical period. If there are no sea level observations for the period of the studied storm, the actual harmonic components must be used to the astronomical tide prediction and changes in sea level must therefore be corrected on this tide prediction [3]; 4) Chart Datum References: when using non digitized tide gauge data or complementary information such as sketches of quays or docks, it is important to verify the consistency of the different chart data. Ignoring these, can lead to significant errors when estimating water levels.…”
Section: Difficulties On the Computation Of Historical Skew Surgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the error depends on the geographic area and the historical period. If there are no sea level observations for the period of the studied storm, the actual harmonic components must be used to the astronomical tide prediction and changes in sea level must therefore be corrected on this tide prediction [3]; 4) Chart Datum References: when using non digitized tide gauge data or complementary information such as sketches of quays or docks, it is important to verify the consistency of the different chart data. Ignoring these, can lead to significant errors when estimating water levels.…”
Section: Difficulties On the Computation Of Historical Skew Surgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct method, based directly on the analysis of maximum tidal water levels (Arns et al., 2013; Bulteau et al., 2015), does not exploit the available knowledge on the astronomical tidal component of the sea level (Mazas et al., 2014; Tawn et al., 1989). Moreover it seems to provide biased estimates of sea level quantiles corresponding to high return periods for locations with large tidal amplitudes (Andreewsky et al., 2014; Haigh et al., 2010). Indirect methods are therefore nowadays privileged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%