2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative 1D and 3D numerical investigation of open-channel junction flows and energy losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant fraction of water is expected to flow through the shorter paths linking the upstream to the downstream part of the flume (red solid lines in Fig.12); along these lines, the mean free-surface gradient is in fact the largest. However, both these paths are characterized by narrow branches (those aligned with the T direction) and by 90°bends, which are known to cause significant head losses (Arrault et al, 2016;El Kadi Abderrezzak et al, 2011;Luo et al, 2018;Mignot et al, 2008;Rivière et al, 2011Rivière et al, , 2014Weber et al, 2001). Hence, most of the water flows along the wider streets, i.e., along the L principal direction (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Laboratory Experiments Under Steady Flow Condmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant fraction of water is expected to flow through the shorter paths linking the upstream to the downstream part of the flume (red solid lines in Fig.12); along these lines, the mean free-surface gradient is in fact the largest. However, both these paths are characterized by narrow branches (those aligned with the T direction) and by 90°bends, which are known to cause significant head losses (Arrault et al, 2016;El Kadi Abderrezzak et al, 2011;Luo et al, 2018;Mignot et al, 2008;Rivière et al, 2011Rivière et al, , 2014Weber et al, 2001). Hence, most of the water flows along the wider streets, i.e., along the L principal direction (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Laboratory Experiments Under Steady Flow Condmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2002) and Luo et al. (2018) (see supporting information). This analysis reveals the fundamental role of the parameter K I , as a value of at least 0.1 is needed to obtain the same qualitative behavior depicted in Figure 6, where the confluence tilts toward the dominant channel (i.e., that carrying more water and sediment).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly, in Figure 7b, we explore the role of different values of the interfacial shear coefficient, from the extreme case K I = 0 (hence, neglecting the effect of the interfacial shear term in the momentum balance) to the more realistic values of 0.2-0.3 reported by Shabayek et al (2002) and Luo et al (2018) (see supporting information). This analysis reveals the fundamental role of the parameter K I , as a value of at least 0.1 is needed to obtain the same qualitative behavior depicted in Figure 6, where the confluence tilts toward the dominant channel (i.e., that carrying more water and sediment).…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since none of the parameters controlling the frictional losses (R m , k s,m / h m , and h m /b m ) seems to explain the increase in the upscaled water depth for large distortion ratios, we hypothesize now that a competition with local losses (flow merging and separation at crossroads, hydraulic jumps, etc.) could be responsible for this result, as discussed hereafter (Luo et al, 2018).…”
Section: 1029/2019wr026774mentioning
confidence: 86%