2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Accuracy of Manual Versus Computerized Electrocardiographic Measurement of J-, ST- and T-Wave Deviations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 Further research is needed to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of triage ECGs; however, they are one potential solution to gaining further reductions in door-to-ECG times, particularly for a very early target such as 4 minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Further research is needed to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of triage ECGs; however, they are one potential solution to gaining further reductions in door-to-ECG times, particularly for a very early target such as 4 minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet such diagnostic ECG computer programs have not been shown to be equal or superior to the specialist physician's judgment 18. Moreover, studies comparing computerized with manual ECG measurements in patients with acute coronary syndrome have shown that computerized measurements have diagnostic cut-offs that differ from manual measurements and may not be used interchangeably 19. This is likely one reason underlying the limited acceptance of such techniques in clinical practice during the follow-up period after coronary revascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, diagnostic ECG computer programs have not yet been shown to be equal or superior to the specialist physician's judgment 15. Moreover, studies comparing computerized with manual ECG measurements in patients with an acute coronary syndrome have shown that computerized measurements have diagnostic cut-offs that differ from manual measurements and therefore may not be used interchangeably 16. This is one of the likely reasons underlying the limited acceptance of such techniques in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%