2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00893
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Aerial and Ground Based High Throughput Phenotyping for the Genetic Dissection of NDVI as a Proxy for Drought Adaptive Traits in Durum Wheat

Abstract: High-throughput phenotyping platforms (HTPPs) provide novel opportunities to more effectively dissect the genetic basis of drought-adaptive traits. This genome-wide association study (GWAS) compares the results obtained with two Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and a ground-based platform used to measure Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in a panel of 248 elite durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum Desf.) accessions at different growth stages and water regimes. Our results suggest increased a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
132
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(127 reference statements)
6
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a counterpart, even if potentially of lower throughput, ground-based phenotyping on single plots using cameras or sensors held by hand [15][16][17] or a pole [18] represent low-cost alternatives to aerial assessments. In addition, shorter distances between sensors and plant targets increase the data spatial resolution [19].The formulation of different wavelength indexes derived from multispectral and hyperspectral sensors and cameras is well established, and their applications to phenotyping range from measurements of biomass (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI [20]) or water content (e.g., water band index, WBI [21]), to assessments of pigment composition (e.g., modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index, MCARI [22]). Canopy temperature measurements are used for the detection of changes in stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, as a response to the water status of the plant [23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a counterpart, even if potentially of lower throughput, ground-based phenotyping on single plots using cameras or sensors held by hand [15][16][17] or a pole [18] represent low-cost alternatives to aerial assessments. In addition, shorter distances between sensors and plant targets increase the data spatial resolution [19].The formulation of different wavelength indexes derived from multispectral and hyperspectral sensors and cameras is well established, and their applications to phenotyping range from measurements of biomass (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI [20]) or water content (e.g., water band index, WBI [21]), to assessments of pigment composition (e.g., modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index, MCARI [22]). Canopy temperature measurements are used for the detection of changes in stomatal conductance and transpiration rates, as a response to the water status of the plant [23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a counterpart, even if potentially of lower throughput, ground-based phenotyping on single plots using cameras or sensors held by hand [15][16][17] or a pole [18] represent low-cost alternatives to aerial assessments. In addition, shorter distances between sensors and plant targets increase the data spatial resolution [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some of these limitations, fitting ultrasonic sonar to ground-based phenotyping platforms may provide accurate measurements. Indeed, the advantage of a ground-based platform is the suitability capturing data at high resolution with minimal errors [32].Generally, the performance of vegetative indices from UAS can be limited by saturation at higher levels of crop canopy cover [19]. Combining vegetative indices from photogrammetric imagery and plant height information may improve herbage yield [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some of these limitations, fitting ultrasonic sonar to ground-based phenotyping platforms may provide accurate measurements. Indeed, the advantage of a ground-based platform is the suitability capturing data at high resolution with minimal errors [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intense sampling is required to determine AUDPC, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can increase data capturing capacity. For example, UAV‐based platforms measuring NDVI improved the speed of data acquisition and with greater accuracy for studying drought adaptive traits of durum wheat cultivars compared to ground‐based Greenseeker sensors (Condorelli et al, ). Furthermore, Shi et al () found that NDVI captured by UAV was strongly predictive of leaf area index and canopy cover, and could subsequently rank cultivars accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%