2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcle.2020.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis between the use of renin–angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The grade of GF was not associated with a greater risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 or to a greater mortality in contrast to what has been described in hospital studies such as that by the COVID-19@Spain Study Group [ 24 ]. Neither were chronic treatments with ACE or ARB-II [ 52 ] or acute treatments with corticoids [ 53 ] related to mortality, although this subgroup of patients was very small. In this sense, of note is the importance of the information provided by studies of prognostic factors of morbidity and mortality by COVID-19, by populational and community bases, in contrast to studies in the hospital setting [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grade of GF was not associated with a greater risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 or to a greater mortality in contrast to what has been described in hospital studies such as that by the COVID-19@Spain Study Group [ 24 ]. Neither were chronic treatments with ACE or ARB-II [ 52 ] or acute treatments with corticoids [ 53 ] related to mortality, although this subgroup of patients was very small. In this sense, of note is the importance of the information provided by studies of prognostic factors of morbidity and mortality by COVID-19, by populational and community bases, in contrast to studies in the hospital setting [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 56 individual studies (two of which combined an individual study and a meta-analysis [25,26]), 12 included both in-and outpatients and 44 included only inpatients. Among the 44 inpatients studies, 30 assessed the effect of chronic use and 12 the effect of in-hospital use, 3 of which assessed both chronic and in-hospital use [27][28][29]. Timing of exposure measurement was uncertain in five of 44.…”
Section: R Esultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty studies 7,19,24,25,27,[29][30][31][32][33]35,37,41,43,45,[48][49][50][51]53,59,60,62,63,[65][66][67][68][69]71,72 (58%) reported data on PaO2/FiO2. The median PaO2/FiO2 at admission ranged from 60 mmHg 44 to 442 mmHg 32 .…”
Section: Gas Exchange At Admissionmentioning
confidence: 99%