2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-460x(03)00072-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of actuator concepts for active gear pair vibration control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lumped parameter method can hardly solve the problems of high nonlinear gearbox system because of its excessively simplified model. In this case, the finite element method [7][8] has been widely used in tackling the problems of vibration related to gear system. Additionally, experimental method [9][10] based on vibration detection is also a very important way to study the vibration of gear system, which can provide the support for vibration simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lumped parameter method can hardly solve the problems of high nonlinear gearbox system because of its excessively simplified model. In this case, the finite element method [7][8] has been widely used in tackling the problems of vibration related to gear system. Additionally, experimental method [9][10] based on vibration detection is also a very important way to study the vibration of gear system, which can provide the support for vibration simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent approach from Guan, Lim and Shepard [9] uses the same actuator design in simulation, however for both gears. In [10] Guan et al compare four different actuator designs including the approaches of [8] and [7]. Their conclusion is that [7] has the most effective design concept, because it shows the best vibration transmissibility from actuator to the housing and because it shows the lowest power ratings and, in contrast to the concepts in [8] and [9], it does not require slip rings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litvin et al [12] proposed a modified geometry of an asymmetric spur gear drive designed as a favorable shape of transmission errors of reduced magnitude and also reduced contact and bending stresses for an asymmetric spur gear drive. Guan et al [13] performed finite element method to simulate the geared rotor system constructed from beam and lumped mass/stiffness elements and compared the required actuation effort, control robustness Nomenclature c radial clearance, c = R À r C damping coefficient of the gear mesh C 1 damping coefficients of the supported structure for bearing 1 C 2 damping coefficients of the supported structure for bearing 2 C 1p dimensionless parameter,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%