Comparative Analysis of Angle Based and Traditional Routing Protocols for MANETs / WSNs

Mishra, Saurabh; Vijay, Sandip

doi:10.15439/2017r90

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been proved from the simulation results that this scheme minimised the consumption of battery and restrained needless hello messaging. In [8], the authors discussed and analyzed the Angle based routing protocols named AAODV, AOLSR and AZRP.These have been developed for Mobile Ad-Hoc networks or mobile WSNs and their comparison is done with the exiting protocols named AODV, DYMO, OLSR, ZRP. In the case if data request received, result is not greatly influenced except AAODV and in the case of transmitted signal; all the protocols are affected uniformly except AOLSR.…”

Section: Related Research Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of AODV and DYMO Routing Protocol using Generic, Micaz and Micamotes Energy Conservation Models in AWSN with Static and Mobile Scenario

Kumar

Dhull

Sharma

et al. 2019

SCPE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adhoc Wireless Sensor Networks (AWSN’s) have found an increasing utility in various applications. In AWSN, sensor nodes are arranged in a topology which is suitable to the requirement of the nature of task. As the sensors are not connected in a fixed manner, their networking, location and functioning keeps on changing based on the situation due to which these are called Adhoc networks. The biggest challenge is to keep the sensors working for longer life by conserving their energy. Therefore, a suitable routing protocol needs to be selected to meet the energy conservation requirement at different nodes. In the present paper, we have evaluated the three energy conservation models i.e. Generic, Micaz and Micamotes for AODV and DYMO routing protocol. The evaluation is carried out using the parameter metrices: (i) Average End-to-End Delay (AEED), (ii) Throughput (iii) Energy consumed in Transmit mode and Receive mode. Based on the simulation results, it has been observed that Micamotes energy model using AODV routing protocol performs better in terms of energy consumption upto 42.99% and 29.90 % in transmit and upto 59.24% and 33.96 % in receive mode respectively as compared to Generic and Micaz energy model.

show abstract

Section: Related Research Workmentioning

confidence: 99%