2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11268-005-0025-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of biotic indices in the monitoring system of running water in a biospheric reserve

Abstract: Comparative analysis of six indices (TBI, FBI, BMWP, ASPPT, BBI, and EPT) was performed at nine sites in the Berezina River basin in the area of the Berezina Biospheric Reserve. The criterion for comparison was the coefficient of variations of an index for different sites in the same time moment and for the same site in different periods. The indices TBI, BMWP, and EPT were found to demonstrate the highest sensitivity and most adequate response to variations in water quality, which allows them to be recommende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In streams, benthic macroinvertebrates reflect e.g., the anthropogenic perturbation, organic pollution, acidification, or other types of stream degradation (Tripole et al, 2008;Mykrä et al, 2012). The biological indices (metrics) are widely recommended and appear to be a valuable tool in monitoring macroinvertebrate response to both unimpacted (reference conditions) and anthropogenic disturbances in rivers throughout the European ecoregions (Aqem, 2002;Rawer-Jost et al, 2004;Semenchenko & Moroz, 2005;Šporka et al, 2006;Leunda et al, 2009;Šporka et al, 2009;Sánchez-Montoya et al, 2010;Torrisi et al, 2010). However, existing studies on macroinvertebrate biological metrics in unimpacted European mountain streams are still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In streams, benthic macroinvertebrates reflect e.g., the anthropogenic perturbation, organic pollution, acidification, or other types of stream degradation (Tripole et al, 2008;Mykrä et al, 2012). The biological indices (metrics) are widely recommended and appear to be a valuable tool in monitoring macroinvertebrate response to both unimpacted (reference conditions) and anthropogenic disturbances in rivers throughout the European ecoregions (Aqem, 2002;Rawer-Jost et al, 2004;Semenchenko & Moroz, 2005;Šporka et al, 2006;Leunda et al, 2009;Šporka et al, 2009;Sánchez-Montoya et al, 2010;Torrisi et al, 2010). However, existing studies on macroinvertebrate biological metrics in unimpacted European mountain streams are still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficiency of biotic indices in assessing the water quality in comparison to the physicochemical-based indices is still questionable. Although there are many studies, which compared different biotic indices [Ravera 2001, Semenchenko, Moroz 2005, Hering et al 2006, there are few studies, which compared the effectiveness of WQI and diatom indices [Pham 2017. Maraşlıoğlu et al [2018] used the physicochemical parameters with modified WQImin to evaluate the water quality of Mert Stream.…”
Section: Journal Of Ecological Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once in the laboratory, the different groups of macroinvertebrates were classified and stored in 70% alcohol for further identification. Many authors have defined different biological indices to measure water quality based on macroinvertebrate populations (Rico et al 1992;Semenchenko and Moroz 2005). The indices used in this study were the Trent Biotic Index (TBI) and the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP), two of the most widely used indices in the last decade.…”
Section: Benthic Invertebrate Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%