2016 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isce.2016.7797324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of classification algorithms on tactile sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low-cost tactile sensor is used to gather the desired data which is a remarkable advantage of our study; it successfully achieves the required tasks and proves its efficiency in collecting data as high-priced sensors such as iCub tactile sensor that performs the same tactile actions with nearly similar accuracy [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A low-cost tactile sensor is used to gather the desired data which is a remarkable advantage of our study; it successfully achieves the required tasks and proves its efficiency in collecting data as high-priced sensors such as iCub tactile sensor that performs the same tactile actions with nearly similar accuracy [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For understanding the information experienced by touch sensors, Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been applied which have shown to be effective in a variety of applications, including object shape recognition. For categorizing contacts, many machine learning classifiers have been constructed to analyze the collected data [7], the most often used ones are naive Bayes [9], Support Vector Machines (SVM) [10], and k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%