2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215119000227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy with endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy in terms of operative time, primary blood loss, post-operative residual tissue and post-operative pain.MethodsThis prospective non-randomised study was carried out on 60 patients aged 5–12 years. One group underwent conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy and the other underwent endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy, with 30 patients per group.ResultsMean operation duration was significantly h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty studies, including 2329 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. 9,10,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These 20 studies showed 4 techniques of adenoidectomy, including PVSA, PFAA, CUA, and SDA. The study selection process is outlined in Figure 1, and the network plot is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twenty studies, including 2329 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. 9,10,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These 20 studies showed 4 techniques of adenoidectomy, including PVSA, PFAA, CUA, and SDA. The study selection process is outlined in Figure 1, and the network plot is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the included studies were randomized controlled trials, except for 3 observational studies. 18,19,27 Of the included 20 studies, 17 reported operative time 10,17,[19][20][21]23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and 12 recorded intraoperative blood loss. [17][18][19][20]24,25,28,29,[31][32][33][34] Five studies recorded postoperative pain scores, 24,29,31,33,34 5 reported the incidence of postoperative residual tissue.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the adverse events of these two surgical procedures, we can conclude that the anatomical layers could be clearly visualized under nasal endoscopy. Coblation also caused lesser blood loss and was associated with a shorter operation time, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative primary or secondary hemorrhage between the two procedures 20–22 . Although the difference in blood loss is statistically significant, it is not clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Coblation also caused lesser blood loss and was associated with a shorter operation time, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative primary or secondary hemorrhage between the two procedures. 20 , 21 , 22 Although the difference in blood loss is statistically significant, it is not clinically significant. Moreover, there is no doubt that plasma adenoid ablation is indeed a step forward in the direction of reducing bleeding, and it is worth considering how to reduce intraoperative bleeding to a greater extent in the future, or even achieve no bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When compared with coblation and microdebrider, suction diathermy is less expensive. 5,13,14 The diathermy wand can be connected to any cautery machine in the operating room which makes it a cost effective technique. In a country where cost is an overriding concern, suction diathermy adenoidectomy is a very good alternative with excellent results and can be performed safely in secondary or tertiary care centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%