2018 Argentine Conference on Automatic Control (AADECA) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/aadeca.2018.8577429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of DFT-Based Synchrophasor Estimators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of synchrophasor estimation algorithms is shown on Figure 1. DFT, IpDFT and FFT were some of the first algorithms applied in PMUs [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. DFTbased algorithms are simple, fast and reliable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification of synchrophasor estimation algorithms is shown on Figure 1. DFT, IpDFT and FFT were some of the first algorithms applied in PMUs [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. DFTbased algorithms are simple, fast and reliable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS and WLS were two of the first algorithms to estimate dynamically changing synchrophasors [26,27]. These algo- DFT, IpDFT and FFT were some of the first algorithms applied in PMUs [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. DFT-based algorithms are simple, fast and reliable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%