2022
DOI: 10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of different shape ventilation elements for protective clothing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Model design of body and jacket (elliptical) [15]Table 1 Material Properties [16; 17]Material propertyHuman body Jacket Average density (kg•m -3 ) 985 1420 Specific heat (J•kg -1 •K -1 ) 3500 1140 Thermal conductivity (W•m -1 •K -1 ) 0.21 0.261 Assumptions/considerations in the Flow Simulation[15]:• No air passes from the top and bottom part of the jacket (considered as closed); this is to study the effectiveness of the ventilation. • The top and bottom parts in simulation have outer environmental effects.• Radiation is not considered in the study, as the heat loss by radiation will be the same in all cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Model design of body and jacket (elliptical) [15]Table 1 Material Properties [16; 17]Material propertyHuman body Jacket Average density (kg•m -3 ) 985 1420 Specific heat (J•kg -1 •K -1 ) 3500 1140 Thermal conductivity (W•m -1 •K -1 ) 0.21 0.261 Assumptions/considerations in the Flow Simulation[15]:• No air passes from the top and bottom part of the jacket (considered as closed); this is to study the effectiveness of the ventilation. • The top and bottom parts in simulation have outer environmental effects.• Radiation is not considered in the study, as the heat loss by radiation will be the same in all cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%