Comparative Analysis of Drug Therapies on Post-injury Recovery in Saudi Adult Orthopaedic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic injuries pose a significant public health concern in Saudi Arabia, affecting individuals across various age groups and occupations. Comprehensive rehabilitation plays a crucial role in improving the functional outcomes of orthopaedic injury patients. However, the impact of pharmacological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in the Saudi Arabian population aged 18 years and older remains an area of active research and clinical interest. This study aims to assess the influence of pharmacological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes, addressing the prevalence, patterns and effectiveness of such interventions in this specific population. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis employs a robust study design to investigate the impact of pharmacological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with orthopaedic injuries aged 18 years and older in Saudi Arabia. Data are collected from medical records, rehabilitation reports and patient surveys, providing a comprehensive assessment of patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment modalities and rehabilitation progress. Statistical analyses are conducted to determine potential associations between pharmacological interventions and rehabilitation outcomes while controlling for relevant confounding variables. Ethical considerations, including patient confidentiality and informed consent, are strictly adhered to throughout the research process. Results: The outcomes of the study suggested that 80% of the clients would prefer to receive services in this manner. About 7% of the participants pointed to the function changes for the better when pharmacological interventions were initiated. In addition, 74.2% reported that they saw a notable improvement in the level of pain they were feeling, while 78%. Two per cent explained that their pain was effectively relieved while undergoing the rehabilitation. Furthermore, a notably large number of subjects (73.3%) responded that the utilisation of medications had a positive impact on their rehabilitation progress. Patient satisfaction regarding pain control and functional outcome was good; 36.7% and 36.31% of participants claimed they were ‘somewhat satisfied’ to ‘very satisfied,’ respectively. Conclusion: This research contributes significantly to the field of orthopaedic rehabilitation by highlighting the positive influence of pharmacological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in the Saudi Arabian population. It emphasises the need for personalised pharmacological approaches and serves as a call to action for clinicians and policymakers to reassess rehabilitation protocols, considering the pivotal role of tailored pharmacological treatment in improving patient care and outcomes. By addressing a previously under-explored area, this study sets the stage for future advancements in orthopaedic injury management.