2017
DOI: 10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i6.23428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Diacerein Versus S-Adenosyl Methionine in the Management of Osteoarthritis of Knee Joint

Abstract: Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) the most common type of arthritis is a degenerative joint disease primarily affecting the articular cartilage and its surrounding tissue. Drugs like Diacerein and S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) are used to remodel the cartilage and slow the progression of the disease, by acting through different mechanisms. Though there is documented evidence of the efficacy of both agents used individually in several clinical trials only a few studies report a comparison. To analyse the efficacy a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-reported adherence method was opted for the compliance of the drug and all patient claimed they have taken all medicine as prescribed so compliance was considered 100% for both groups but the patients in both group were unable to recall the exact dose of rescue medication used by them hence it was considered as no use of rescue medication on both group. 17,19 In within group analysis the increase in VAS and WOMAC scores are comparatively lower in diacerein group when compared at 45 days which signifies the carryover effect of diacerein which has been also shown in other studies. 17,19,21 As aceclofenac is established treatment in view of safety and efficacy in this study it has been used as control to evaluate the efficacy of diacerein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The self-reported adherence method was opted for the compliance of the drug and all patient claimed they have taken all medicine as prescribed so compliance was considered 100% for both groups but the patients in both group were unable to recall the exact dose of rescue medication used by them hence it was considered as no use of rescue medication on both group. 17,19 In within group analysis the increase in VAS and WOMAC scores are comparatively lower in diacerein group when compared at 45 days which signifies the carryover effect of diacerein which has been also shown in other studies. 17,19,21 As aceclofenac is established treatment in view of safety and efficacy in this study it has been used as control to evaluate the efficacy of diacerein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…17,19 In within group analysis the increase in VAS and WOMAC scores are comparatively lower in diacerein group when compared at 45 days which signifies the carryover effect of diacerein which has been also shown in other studies. 17,19,21 As aceclofenac is established treatment in view of safety and efficacy in this study it has been used as control to evaluate the efficacy of diacerein. 22 In our study no serious adverse effect has been recorded.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%