1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01123639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of estimates of neutron radiative capture cross sections for the most important fission products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also known that elements which have sharply different radiative capture cross sections in the thermal and epithermal neutron ranges are used as emitters in direct-charge detectors. Specifically, for direct-charge detectors with a rhodium emitter the 103 Rh(n, γ) reaction cross section for thermal neutrons is 145 b, at the 1.253 eV resonance the value is 5100 b, and the resonance integral is 1100 b [23]. Consequently, for different fractions of the thermal and resonance neutrons in the spectra the results of the calibration of the in-reactor detectors in the GIDRA and other reactors will be substantially different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is also known that elements which have sharply different radiative capture cross sections in the thermal and epithermal neutron ranges are used as emitters in direct-charge detectors. Specifically, for direct-charge detectors with a rhodium emitter the 103 Rh(n, γ) reaction cross section for thermal neutrons is 145 b, at the 1.253 eV resonance the value is 5100 b, and the resonance integral is 1100 b [23]. Consequently, for different fractions of the thermal and resonance neutrons in the spectra the results of the calibration of the in-reactor detectors in the GIDRA and other reactors will be substantially different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The microscopic approach in the nuclear theory accounts for specificity of each nucleus through its single-particle and collective (phonon) spectra. Therefore, it allows "some irregular changes" obtained in the global phenomenological models for nuclear reactions data [3] to be seen and checked. Thus, for double-magic nuclei it is necessary to use the microscopic approaches for both PSF and NLD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%