Comparative analysis of FDI by Indian and Chinese MNEs in Europe

Abstract

Purpose Exploration of potential markets in foreign regions such as Europe becomes critical for emerging market multinational enterprises (MNEs). This study aims to investigate structural factors that affect the location choice of Chinese and Indian MNEs in Europe and compares them with USA and Japanese MNEs. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a holistic approach to identify possible configurations of the determinants of Indian and Chinese outward foreign direct investment (FDI) into 38 European countries. The authors test two configurations as follows: knowledge-seeking by Chinese and Indian MNEs in “non-predictable” markets; market-seeking by USA and Japanese MNEs. Findings The findings reveal several strategies deployed in Europe by Chinese and Indian MNEs that are more specific than the pure strategies identified in the literature (e.g. market-seeking, knowledge-seeking). More importantly, unlike USA and Japanese MNEs, the findings confirm a two-stage strategy hypothesis for Chinese MNEs in Europe. Additionally, they show that the quality of institutions and infrastructure underlies the attractiveness of a territory. Research limitations/implications Multilevel configurational research might have also been used to consider firm- and industry-level determinants. Practical implications Good governance positively affects the entire set of locational determinants. In addition, good infrastructure and institutions are necessary conditions for a country to attract FDI inflow. Originality/value Recent internationalization models have been useful in identifying drivers of FDI by emerging market multinational enterprises vs advanced market multinational enterprises in Europe. This study mobilizes a comparative configurational approach.

Determining the influence of LPI, GCI and IR on FDI: A study on the Asia and Pacific Region

“…An Indian study revealed that to increase FDI inflow and export development, Indian officials have focused more on expanding all types of logistical infrastructure [18]. Affirming the above-explained findings, Avioutskii and Tensaout [19] examined the importance of logistics infrastructure in attracting FDI into the European region in a similar study. Similarly, Souza, Goh [20], highlighted that multinational firms are one of the many parties involved in FDI, contributing significantly to global FDI flows.…”

Macroeconomic Determinants of Competitiveness: Evidences From Factor Efficiency and Innovation-Driven Countries

“…Foreign direct investment has been questioned due to reducing employment in the home country, as well as increasing employment, promoting technology transfer, and encouraging growth and exports in the host country. Foreign direct investment (FDI) through increased capital inflows leads to more employment, more innovation, and development of national industry and higher exports, which in turn improves national competitiveness (Owczarczuk, 2020;Avioutskii & Tensaout, 2020). Furthermore, based on some empirical literature, the impact of foreign direct investment on national competitiveness and entrepreneurship depends on the level of development of the countries (Rusu & Roman, 2018).…”

A co-evolution perspective of EMNE internationalization and institutions: An integrative framework of 5Cs

“…EMNEs are no exception. Well-established institutions attract EMNEs to take advantage of such favorable conditions and reduce transaction costs for foreign operations (Avioutskii & Tensaout, 2021;Cui et al, 2016). They also help boost risk-taking capabilities by reducing information asymmetry and the regulatory ambiguity associated with OFDI activities (Lu et al, 2014).…”