Comparative analysis of ground-based weather radar and space-borne GPM data

Devika, M B; Pradeep, Kumar C; Prasad, D. Babu Rajendra

doi:10.1109/rteict.2017.8256831

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of these studies were carried out in the United States, Canada, South America, and South Korea. Apart from these EOP field campaigns, individual research groups also reported the validations of GPM data products with ground-based radars, disdrometers, and rain gauges (Devika et al 2017;Gao et al 2021;Hsu et al 2021;Huang et al 2022;Huang et al 2021a,b;Le et al 2010;Li et al 2021;Murali Krishna et al 2017;Pabla et al 2022;Shen et al 2022;Toyoshima et al 2015;Wang et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of GPM DPR Rain Parameters with North Taiwan Disdrometers

Seela,

Janapati,

Lin

et al. 2024

Journal of Hydrometeorology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global precipitation demonstrates a substantial role in the hydrological cycle and offers tremendous implications in hydro-meteorological studies. Advanced remote sensing instrumentations, such as the NASA Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) can estimate precipitation and cloud properties, and has a unique capability to estimate the raindrop size information globally at snapshots in time. The present study validates the Level-2 data products of the GPM DPR with the long-term measurements of seven north Taiwan Joss-Waldvogel disdrometers from 2014 to 2021. The precipitation and drop size distribution parameters like rainfall rate (R, mm h−1), radar reflectivity factor (dBZ), mass-weighted mean drop diameter (Dm, mm), and normalized intercept parameter (Nw, m−3 mm−1) of the GPM DPR are compared with the disdrometers. Four different comparison approaches (point match, 5 km average, 10 km average, and optimal method) are used for the validation; among these four, the optimal strategy provided reasonable agreement between the GPM DPR and the disdrometers. The GPM DPR revealed superior performance in estimating the rain parameters in stratiform precipitation than the convective precipitation. Irrespective of algorithm type (dual- or single-frequency algorithm), sensitivity analysis revealed superior agreement for the mass-weighted mean diameter and inferior agreement for the normalized intercept parameter.

show abstract