2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2187904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Models for Prediction of BP Reactivity to Crossed Legs

Abstract: Crossing the legs at the knees, during BP measurement, is one of the several physiological stimuli that considerably influence the accuracy of BP measurements. Therefore, it is paramount to develop an appropriate prediction model for interpreting influence of crossed legs on BP. This research work described the use of principal component analysis- (PCA-) fused forward stepwise regression (FSWR), artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and least squares support vector mac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsoft Excel 2013 was used to estimate and evaluate the parameters by fitting the experimental values to the proposed. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), chi‐square ( χ 2 ), root‐mean‐square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and residual sum of squares (RSS) of each mathematical model were calculated, and a suitable model was chosen based on the goodness of fit with the highest value of R 2 and lowest value of χ 2 , RMSE, MAPE, and RSS (Afolabi, Tunde‐Akintunde, & Adeyanju, 2015; Kaur, Arora, & Jain, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsoft Excel 2013 was used to estimate and evaluate the parameters by fitting the experimental values to the proposed. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), chi‐square ( χ 2 ), root‐mean‐square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and residual sum of squares (RSS) of each mathematical model were calculated, and a suitable model was chosen based on the goodness of fit with the highest value of R 2 and lowest value of χ 2 , RMSE, MAPE, and RSS (Afolabi, Tunde‐Akintunde, & Adeyanju, 2015; Kaur, Arora, & Jain, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solver add-in in Microsoft Excel 2013 was used to estimate and evaluate the parameters by fitting the experimental values to the proposed. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), chi-square (χ 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and residual sum of squares (RSS) of each mathematical model were calculated and a suitable model was chosen based on the goodness of fit with the highest value of R 2 and lowest value of χ 2 , RMSE, MAPE, and RSS (Afolabi et al, 2015;Kaur et al, 2017).…”
Section: Model Parameters Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%