Comparative Analysis of Hysteresis Current Control Strategies to Achieve Nearly Constant Switching Frequency for a Two- Level Inverter Fed IM Drive

Krishnatheeram, Srikar; Peter, Joseph; Ramchand, Rijil

doi:10.1109/iecon.2018.8591750

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The only difference that arises is in the implementation of the techniques. [15][16][17][18] This is well explained in Table 5 keeping in mind the space vector structure of the 3LI.…”

Section: Three-level Voltage Vectors Region and Dwell Timementioning

confidence: 87%

“…The 3LI also has different types of SVPWM schemes employed to it in order to get its own advantages, the techniques are similar to that of 2LI, that is, continuous SVPWM and discontinuous SVPWM. The only difference that arises is in the implementation of the techniques 15‐18 . This is well explained in Table 5 keeping in mind the space vector structure of the 3LI.…”

Section: Three‐level Voltage Source Invertermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conventional Space Vector PWM (CSVPWM) (uses two active and zero vectors at time for generating reference vector), Bus Clamping 30, and Bus Clamping 60 (uses two active and one zero vectors at time for generating reference vector) are used for generating the needed pulses to fire the three‐level inverter 11‐14 . Discontinuous PWM helps to reduce the switching losses 15‐18 . So the current error variations and boundaries obtained using these techniques will help to predict the behavior of HCC using similar voltage vector selections for error boundary formulations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[11][12][13][14] Discontinuous PWM helps to reduce the switching losses. [15][16][17][18] So the current error variations and boundaries obtained using these techniques will help to predict the behavior of HCC using similar voltage vector selections for error boundary formulations. Many SVPWM-based PWM fed three-level inverter are proposed in the literature, but they have not deal with the current error boundary investigations of motor drive.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Space vector PWM ‐based current error boundary investigations for three‐level VSI fed induction motor drive

Peter

Ramchand

2021

Int Trans Electr Energ Syst

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field oriented control (FOC) of induction motor (IM) powered by a threelevel voltage source inverter (3L -VSI) with space vector (SV) based continuous and dis -continuous pulse width modulation (PWM) is presented in this paper. The current error variations in each sector with above-mentioned PWM techniques are monitored and analyzed mathematically. These boundary investigations play a great role in the implementation of Current Error Space Phasor (CESP) based hysteresis current controller (HCC) which incorporates the advantages of a constant switching frequency PWM fed three-level inverter (3LI) into highly dynamic current controlledvoltage source inverter. As a preliminary step, FOC of IM with the conventional space vector PWM and bus clamping PWM (BC30 and BC60) fed 3LI have been simulated using SIMULINK toolbox of MATLAB. Transient analysis of the drive with acceleration, deceleration, and load change studies with different switching schemes are analyzed with d SPACE RTI1103 experimentation on a 2.2 kW three-phase IM drive in detail. K E Y W O R D Sbus clamping PWM, current error space Phasor, current ripple, field-oriented control, three-level inverter | INTRODUCTIONMotor drives are the backbone of global industry. Rapid industrialization all around and demand for the control of electric power for electric motor drives are at an increase rate every day. Inverters are introduced, which have the ability of generating voltage with variable magnitude and frequency, and thus AC motor drives are on the rise in current market. Inverter fed drives are nowadays being called adjustable speed drives. As in the case of the AC motor being used, it is the induction motor that is on high demand due to its sturdy construction, absence of brushes, etc. 1 Inverters can be classified into voltage source inverter (VSI) and current source inverter (CSI). VSI's are preferred to CSI's for the recent past especially in the low and medium voltage drives. [2][3][4][5] Current controlled VSI's are more promising for high-performance drives which offer better dynamic behavior.

show abstract

“…The only difference that arises is in the implementation of the techniques. [15][16][17][18] This is well explained in Table 5 keeping in mind the space vector structure of the 3LI.…”

Section: Three-level Voltage Vectors Region and Dwell Timementioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Three‐level Voltage Source Invertermentioning

confidence: 99%