2016 International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing, Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icgtspicc.2016.7955327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of image quality measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former methods are used to assess the quality of the generated results by using subjective evaluation, and the latter methods are used to evaluate model fitting in the echo domain and image domain by using the following evaluation metrics. NCC: The similarity of the two signals is assessed with the NCC [29]. When it is −1, the inversion signal is negatively correlated with the original echo, when it is 0, it is not correlated, and when it is 1, it is positively correlated.where M and N represent the number of SAR signal data range lines and range sampling points, respectively, a and r represent the azimuth and range positions, respectively, J ( a , r ) represents the jamming signal, E ( a , r ) represents the original echo signal, μ J and σ J represent the mean and standard deviation of the jamming signal, respectively, and μ E and σ E represent the mean and standard deviation of the original echo signal, respectively. PSNR: The PSNR [30] is a quantitative metric to evaluate the quality of the inversion image according to the error between the original image and the inversion image. It is defined as follows:where MAX represents the maximum value in the dynamic range of the pixel values, and I J and I E represent the inversion image and the original image, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The former methods are used to assess the quality of the generated results by using subjective evaluation, and the latter methods are used to evaluate model fitting in the echo domain and image domain by using the following evaluation metrics. NCC: The similarity of the two signals is assessed with the NCC [29]. When it is −1, the inversion signal is negatively correlated with the original echo, when it is 0, it is not correlated, and when it is 1, it is positively correlated.where M and N represent the number of SAR signal data range lines and range sampling points, respectively, a and r represent the azimuth and range positions, respectively, J ( a , r ) represents the jamming signal, E ( a , r ) represents the original echo signal, μ J and σ J represent the mean and standard deviation of the jamming signal, respectively, and μ E and σ E represent the mean and standard deviation of the original echo signal, respectively. PSNR: The PSNR [30] is a quantitative metric to evaluate the quality of the inversion image according to the error between the original image and the inversion image. It is defined as follows:where MAX represents the maximum value in the dynamic range of the pixel values, and I J and I E represent the inversion image and the original image, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSNR: The PSNR [30] is a quantitative metric to evaluate the quality of the inversion image according to the error between the original image and the inversion image. It is defined as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us assume 𝑫𝒔 is the image set 1, which is original dataset, comprises of Np images and let 𝑫 ̂𝒔 be the image set 2, which is compressed dataset. The average SSIM (𝑺 𝒂𝒗𝒈 ) is calculated using the following equation (1) [24][25].…”
Section: B Study Of Performance Of Wavelet-based Compressed Domain Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the average PSNR (𝑃𝑆𝑁𝑅 𝑎𝑣𝑔 )is calculated using the equation (2) [25][26]. Case (i) here the approximation images are used for training and the PWH masked approximation images are used for testing, for 𝑷=100 the obtained training accuracy was 97% which is adequately good which implies no information loss in testing set.…”
Section: B Study Of Performance Of Wavelet-based Compressed Domain Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%