2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of in vitro characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed urethral and epididymal spermatozoa from cats (Felis domesticus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
26
3
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
26
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because no significant differences were found, we can state that spermatozoa from both types of semen equally retain their ability to produce embryos after freezing-thawing. The present study completes our previous reports about comparable characteristics of spermatozoa collected from the urethra and epididymis (Prochowska et al 2015, Prochowska et al 2016 and finishes an overall picture of the quality of urethral semen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because no significant differences were found, we can state that spermatozoa from both types of semen equally retain their ability to produce embryos after freezing-thawing. The present study completes our previous reports about comparable characteristics of spermatozoa collected from the urethra and epididymis (Prochowska et al 2015, Prochowska et al 2016 and finishes an overall picture of the quality of urethral semen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the contrary, in swine cryopreserved epididymal semen appeared to be superior to ejaculated, both fresh and frozen-thawed, and the authors linked it with high post-thaw motility of epididymal spermatozoa (Rath and Niemman 1997). For cats, we did not observe differences in the post thawed motility, viability, acrosome integrity or mitochondrial function between urethral and epididymal sperm cells (Prochowska et al 2016), which may explain lack of difference in fertilizing potential. This study seems to prove that both types of spermatozoa comparably maintain anatomical and functional features that are necessary to penetrate and fertilize an oocyte.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Flow cytometric approach allowed for identification of different patterns of changes during different methods of semen preservation. Cryopreservation caused mostly loss of membrane and acrosome integrity, which is a common finding in many species (Niżański, Klimowicz, Partyka, Savić, & Dubiel, ; Partyka, Nizański, & Łukaszewicz, ; Prochowska, Niżański, & Partyka, ) and was reported previously for chinchillas as well (Ponce et al., ). This can be explained by the strong damage that occurs during freezing and thawing (Ahmad, Nasrullah, Riaz, Sattar, & Ahmad, ; Yoon, Kwon, Rahman, Lee, & Pang, ), but also by the addition of glycerol, which also resulted in membrane and acrosome damages (Yoon et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…При применении SF более 40 % сперматозоидов в среднем сохраняют жизнеспособность, причем криоконсервация не отражается на доле морфо-логически нормальных сперматозоидов. По данным ли-тературы, она варьирует для эпидидимального семени у разных видов кошачьих от 25.0 до 78.5 % (Prochowska et al, 2016), и приведенные здесь результаты укладываются в этот интервал. Следует отметить, что наиболее частыми аномалиями сперматозоидов в нашем исследовании были комбинированные и аномалии хвоста, что согласуется с данными других исследований (Contri et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Обычно процедуры замораживания -оттаивания снижают жизнеспособность сперматозоидов эпидидимального семени домашних котов на 20-30 % (Luvoni, 2006;Kunkitti et al, 2016;Prochowska et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified