2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15027684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of MIR168 promoters in three plant species

Abstract: ABSTRACT. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the regulation of gene expression by post-transcriptionally targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression. miR168 is a key miRNA because it regulates the expression of the slicer protein ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), which catalyzes mRNA cleavage. Interestingly, plant miR168s are highly evolutionarily conserved; however, it is unclear whether MIR168 promoter elements and expression patterns are also conserved. Here, we isolated MIR168 promoters from monocot … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that MdmiR285N is an endogenous miRNA of apple, our results show that its putative TFBSbased gene regulatory profile is conserved in the heterologous system A. thaliana, thus suggesting also that the regulation of genes involved in defense responses may be similar between the two plant species examined. This is in line with previous comparative studies showing the conservation of the regulatory networks in the promoter of MIR168 in M. domestica and A. thaliana 48 . Moreover, such a heterogeneous network of gene regulatory elements indicates that the posttranscriptional activity of MdmiR285N on its target resistance transcripts is differentially regulated during various phases of the plant life cycle and thus it is not only limited to the molecular mechanisms triggered by plant-pathogen interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Taking into account that MdmiR285N is an endogenous miRNA of apple, our results show that its putative TFBSbased gene regulatory profile is conserved in the heterologous system A. thaliana, thus suggesting also that the regulation of genes involved in defense responses may be similar between the two plant species examined. This is in line with previous comparative studies showing the conservation of the regulatory networks in the promoter of MIR168 in M. domestica and A. thaliana 48 . Moreover, such a heterogeneous network of gene regulatory elements indicates that the posttranscriptional activity of MdmiR285N on its target resistance transcripts is differentially regulated during various phases of the plant life cycle and thus it is not only limited to the molecular mechanisms triggered by plant-pathogen interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%