Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body

Moradian, Milad; Modanloo, Vahid; Aghaiee, Soroush

doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2018.02.001

Cited by 58 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To be able to statistically analyze these conflicts and select methods whose results will be the basis for deciding and selecting the optimal alternative and their rank, it is necessary to consider as many different methods as possible that would form a sufficient sample [34,[57][58][59].…”

Section: Model Of the Integrative Multi-criteria Ranking Of Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-Criteria Selection of the Optimal Parameters for High-Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloy Al7075 Thin-Walled Parts

Lukić

Čep

Vukman

et al. 2020

Metals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thin-walled parts made of aluminum alloy are mostly used as structural elements in the aerospace, automobile, and military industries due to good homogeneity, corrosion resistance, and the excellent ratio between mechanical properties and mass. Manufacturing of these parts is mainly performed by removing a large volume of material, so it is necessary to choose quality machining parameters that will achieve high productivity and satisfactory quality and accuracy of machining. Using the Taguchi methodology, an experimental plan is created and realized. Based on its results and comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, optimal levels of machining parameters in high-speed milling of thin-walled parts made of aluminum alloy Al7075 are selected. The varying input parameters are wall thickness, cutting parameters, and tool path strategies. The output parameters are productivity, surface quality, dimensional accuracy, the accuracy of forms and surface position, representing the optimization criteria. Selection of the optimal machining parameter levels and their ranking is realized using 14 MCDM methods. Afterward, the obtained results are compared using correlation analysis. At the output, integrative decisions were made on selecting the optimal level and rank of alternative levels of machining parameters.

show abstract

Section: Model Of the Integrative Multi-criteria Ranking Of Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In most papers, one or a few MCDM methods are used to select the optimal variant of products, processes, resources, materials, etc. When a large number of these methods are applied, it is necessary to compare them and make a final integrative decision about the selection of the optimal solution [34,[57][58][59]].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Criteria Selection of the Optimal Parameters for High-Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloy Al7075 Thin-Walled Parts

Lukić

Čep

Vukman

et al. 2020

Metals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different groups of MCDM methods are compared and applied in different practical implementation areas, which brings different insights. The most recent research on this topic are: the work of [17], a comparative analysis among MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis), TOPSIS and VIKOR methods (the compromise ranking method) for selecting the best material for braking booster valve body; [18], whose research incorporates AHP, MARE and ELECTRE III to deal with equipment selection task; [19], who compared Simple Additive Weighting Method, Weighted product method, AHP and TOPSIS for the energy demand planning; and [20], who carried out a study among MAUT, AHP and TOPSIS on the application of a gender inequality index.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Methods for Urban Sewer Network Plan Selection

Abdul-Nour

2020

CivilEng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Selecting a suitable sewer network plan for a city is a complex and challenging task that requires discussion among a group of experts and the consideration of multiple conflicting criteria with different measurement units. A number of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been proposed for analyzing sewer network selection problems, each having their own distinct advantages and limitations. Although many decision-making techniques are available, decision-makers are confronted with the difficult task of selecting the appropriate MCDM method, as each method can lead to different results when applied to an identical problem. This paper evaluates four different multi-criteria decision-making methods, which are the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE III) and the Preference Ranking Organization METHods for Enrichment Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II), for one sewer network group decision problem in the early stage of sewer water infrastructure asset management. Moreover, during the implementation of different MCDM methods, the Delphi technique is introduced to organize and structure the discussions among all the decision-makers. The results of the study are examined based on each method’s ability to provide accurate representations of the decision-makers’ preferences and their experience implementing each method. As a conclusion, decision-makers identify PROMETHEE II as their favorite method, AHP is more time and energy consuming and results in a number of inconsistencies, while TOPSIS loses information during vector normalization for multi-dimension criteria, and ELECTRE III’s results are inconclusive.

show abstract

“…Kaya et al (2019) [35] reviewed some MCDM methodologies in energy policy making. Moradian et al (2018) [36] compared some MCDM methods MOORA, TOPSIS and VIKOR.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method: A Symmetric Analysis of the Selection of the Best Water Distribution System

Narayanamoorthy

Annapoorani

Kalaiselvan³

2020

Symmetry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Every country’s influence and livelihood is centered on that country’s water source. Therefore, many studies are being conducted worldwide to improve and sustain water resources. In this research paper, we have selected and researched the water scheme for groundwater recharge and drinking water supply of drought prone areas. The water project is aimed at connecting the drought prone areas of the three districts of Tamil Nadu to filling up the ponds in their respective villages and raising the ground water level and meeting the drinking water requirement. We have chosen a multi-criteria decision method to select the best alternative in a complex situation. When reviewing the implementation of this water project, many experts and people who will benefit from this project may have some hesitation and ambiguity in their suggestion on choosing the best water distribution system.We believe that the benefits of this project can be fully availed of if we choose a water distribution system. Our contribution in this article is to choose the best water distribution system for this project by use of our proposed multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, hesitant fuzzy standard deviation with multi-objective optimization method by ratio analysis (HFSDV-MOORA), hesitant fuzzy standard deviation with technique, for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (HFSDV-TOPSIS) and hesitant fuzzy standard deviation with VIsekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (HFSDV-VIKOR), which will provide the best solution for improving the water resource for the drought-prone areas of three districts. Finally, we have identified and compared the correlation coefficient between proposed methods. As a result of the study, it has been found that the best water supply system is closed concrete pipes laid along agricultural land through the rural areas.

show abstract

Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body

Cited by 58 publications

References 23 publications

Multi-Criteria Selection of the Optimal Parameters for High-Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloy Al7075 Thin-Walled Parts

Multi-Criteria Selection of the Optimal Parameters for High-Speed Machining of Aluminum Alloy Al7075 Thin-Walled Parts

Comparison of Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Methods for Urban Sewer Network Plan Selection

Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method: A Symmetric Analysis of the Selection of the Best Water Distribution System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About