2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-012-9218-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of On-Site Free-Hand Chainsaw Milling and Fixed Site Mini-Bandsaw Milling of Smallholder Timber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As found by this study, the factors affecting the operational performance were those generally reported in similar studies, describing significant dependence relations between the parameters characterizing the dimensions of the inputs and the time consumption (e.g., [42][43][44][45]), which in turn affect the variation in productivity and efficiency. Such model parameters estimated by this study are confirmed by their counterparts found for similar machine types and sizes (e.g., [42][43][44]). In this regard, however, one of the merits of this study is that it maps the relations between the inputs, resources used, and outputs, by a system-centered perspective, providing detailed models characterizing such dependence relations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As found by this study, the factors affecting the operational performance were those generally reported in similar studies, describing significant dependence relations between the parameters characterizing the dimensions of the inputs and the time consumption (e.g., [42][43][44][45]), which in turn affect the variation in productivity and efficiency. Such model parameters estimated by this study are confirmed by their counterparts found for similar machine types and sizes (e.g., [42][43][44]). In this regard, however, one of the merits of this study is that it maps the relations between the inputs, resources used, and outputs, by a system-centered perspective, providing detailed models characterizing such dependence relations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…An example of this is when farmers sell standing trees and logs to sawmillers. When timber volumes are low and tree farms are small and fragmented in the landscape, free-hand chainsaw milling is an operationally suitable technology (Cedamon et al 2013). Portable sawmills are another technological option for primary processing on site.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These technologies have considerable advantages such as low capital outlays and mobility for millers. However, sawn timber recovery rates tend to be lower, and this is further aggravated by unskilled operators who are also under high risk of injury (Cedamon et al 2013;Dugan 2007). Hence, adequate human capital is crucial for processing, whether it be stationary mills or mobile technologies.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the opposite side, there are the small to medium-sized sawmilling facilities characterized by low processing capacities [2] and, typically, by the absence of automation [3,4]. With some exceptions, these use rather obsolete technology, are operated by a small number of workers and do not hold production planning and management capabilities [5][6][7][8]. Still, they support local economies by providing added value and by diversification in opportunities for employment, while also complementing the sawmilling capabilities of a region to valorize wood assortments which are less demanded by large processing facilities [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, concepts of using different kinds of sensors to automate the extraction of useful data were described for rather more complicated operations and equipment [15,16]. In relation to sawmilling operations, the beginning of operational monitoring was most likely characterized by the use of manual solutions based on the concepts of traditional time-and-motion studies [17,18], which aimed at characterizing the productive performance in small-to-medium sawmilling operations of various configurations [3,[5][6][7][8]19]. However, these became less practical to implement due to the resources spent to collect and process large amounts of data [20], the reluctance of operators when facing observation, and the capability limits of the observers [21]; in addition, manual data collection procedures hold a limited ability to capture the pattern in operational performance over a long term, restricting the applicability of the developed statistics in a range of variations from which they were built [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%